Review Texas v. Johnson. Assuming you want to sustain the conviction, make the best argument you can for how that can be 

reconciled with the First Amendment. Of the opinions that would have sustained the conviction, which do you find most persuasive 

and why?
Evaluating Van Orden v. Perry, as a public administrator, in the rule of law, explain to what extent your beliefs should affect 

your reactions to the various justices’ opinions.
As a public administrator over a particular entity, describe when public officials should be allowed to conduct their activities 

in secret. Provide an example.
Evaluating New York Times v. United States, provide an example in which it may be warranted to violate the morality of the 

freedom of information by publicizing a secret identity to prove a point. Explain how this example warrants the morality 

violation.