Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 275) EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine (Ch 9, p 314)
TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. . Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 275) EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine (Ch 9, p 314) The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below. Use font size 12 and 1” margins. Include cover page and reference page. At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing. No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references. Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style. References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.
Grading Criteria Assignments Maximum Points Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria 40 Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts 20 Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts 30 Uses proper mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, and spelling 10 Total
100
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
Tuesday, 27 June 2017
List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case. Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges?
List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case. Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges?
Scenario
Janet Johnson, an African American woman, has been working at the Tennessee Hydroelectric plant for 15 years. During that time, his performance reviews have been exemplary. She decided to apply for the new plant foreman position. Although she felt that she was eminently qualified for the position, she also was growing tired of a certain good old boy culture at the plant. For years, the plant has had a culture of highly lewd “jokes,” and many of the employees had also engaged in inappropriate touching of female employees. The plant had an anti-harassment policy on record, but Janet’s boss shrugged and said “boys will be boys” when she reported the harassment to him.Competition for the position was fierce. But ultimately, Jose Martinez, a Chilean man, received the position. Jose had 7 years of experience.
Unbeknownst to the applicants the promotion board secretly ran a credit check on the applicants. Janet credit score came in as lower as average, and this factored into the board’s decision. Although he met the qualifications of the position, one of the hiring managers told Janet in confidence that Janet was the most qualified person for the job. And the other managers had applied a racial preference on Jose’s behalf due to there never having been a Latino manager at the plant even though Latino’s represented 35% of employees at the plant. Janet sues the plant for disparate treatment, disparate impact, and sexual harassment under Title VII.
Questions List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case. Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges? Who would ultimately prevail? List the elements of a disparate impact case and apply them to this case? Will Janet prevail on this charge? List the elements of the sexual harassment case and apply them to this case? Can the plant establish an affirmative defense? If the plant argues that it applied a racial preference to Jose to correct a manifest imbalance at the plant of underutilization of certain minorities, will the plant prevail? Why or why not? Was it legal to use the credit check as a factor in the promotion decision the way that it was done here? Why or why not?
Grading Criteria Assignments Maximum Points Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria 40 Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts 20 Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts 30 Uses proper mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, and spelling 10 Total
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
Scenario
Janet Johnson, an African American woman, has been working at the Tennessee Hydroelectric plant for 15 years. During that time, his performance reviews have been exemplary. She decided to apply for the new plant foreman position. Although she felt that she was eminently qualified for the position, she also was growing tired of a certain good old boy culture at the plant. For years, the plant has had a culture of highly lewd “jokes,” and many of the employees had also engaged in inappropriate touching of female employees. The plant had an anti-harassment policy on record, but Janet’s boss shrugged and said “boys will be boys” when she reported the harassment to him.Competition for the position was fierce. But ultimately, Jose Martinez, a Chilean man, received the position. Jose had 7 years of experience.
Unbeknownst to the applicants the promotion board secretly ran a credit check on the applicants. Janet credit score came in as lower as average, and this factored into the board’s decision. Although he met the qualifications of the position, one of the hiring managers told Janet in confidence that Janet was the most qualified person for the job. And the other managers had applied a racial preference on Jose’s behalf due to there never having been a Latino manager at the plant even though Latino’s represented 35% of employees at the plant. Janet sues the plant for disparate treatment, disparate impact, and sexual harassment under Title VII.
Questions List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case. Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges? Who would ultimately prevail? List the elements of a disparate impact case and apply them to this case? Will Janet prevail on this charge? List the elements of the sexual harassment case and apply them to this case? Can the plant establish an affirmative defense? If the plant argues that it applied a racial preference to Jose to correct a manifest imbalance at the plant of underutilization of certain minorities, will the plant prevail? Why or why not? Was it legal to use the credit check as a factor in the promotion decision the way that it was done here? Why or why not?
Grading Criteria Assignments Maximum Points Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria 40 Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts 20 Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts 30 Uses proper mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, and spelling 10 Total
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
If Analog Computers can borrow at 9.5% for 3 years, what is the effective rate of interest on a $800,000 loan where a 15% compensating balance is required?
If Analog Computers can borrow at 9.5% for 3 years, what is the effective rate of interest on a $800,000 loan where a 15% compensating balance is required?
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
Discuss a current law you have started to tune into more since this course started
Identify one of the many Websites you visited during this course that you enjoyed or found most helpful to you. Explain why it was beneficial to you. •Discuss a current law you have started to tune into more since this course started. Explain why you seem to be following it more closely and what you seem to be focused more on having taken this class.
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
Share two new insights about constitutional and administrative law you have discovered from this course
Share two new insights about constitutional and administrative law you have discovered from this course. •Make a persuasive argument for this type of course being a requirement for every public administrator.
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get this Paper Done ………
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)