1) Perform a literature search on the grieving process, using readings from Module 5, the GCU Library, or other Web sites and material at your
disposal. Focus on the work of Kübler-Ross' grieving process and the stages of grief. 2) Review the story of Job in the Bible, focusing on his suffering and grief. Examine how this story correlates to the grieving process defined by Kübler-Ross. 3) include the following:a) Compare and contrast the grieving process as defined by Kübler-Ross and the story of Job with that of at least one other religion. b) Compare the relationship and interaction between joy and the above grieving models and examples.c) Relate your research to your own preferred method of handling grief. State whether your research has changed your view of grief. 4) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is/is not required.5) This assignment uses a grading rubric that can be viewed at the assignment's drop box. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and
expectations for successful completion of the assignment.Module 5 Rubric: Healthy Grief v3.1 Points Possible 12 Criteria Achievement Level Unsatisfactory (0%) Less than Satisfactory (65%) Satisfactory (75%) Good (85%) Excellent (100%)Comprehension of concepts of healthy grief 0 points Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. 3.12 points Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Presentation of material does not meet minimal requirements of the
assignment. Demonstrates no critical thinking aspects. 3.6 points Exhibits comprehension of the material and attempts to integrate it with outside material. Provides basic information and demonstrates minimal level of research conducted on the grieving process and the biblical story of Job. 4.08 points Demonstrates integrative comprehension. Presentation of material demonstrates creativity and ability to connect concepts in a critically thinking manner. Concepts and components illustrated indicate advanced understanding and level of research conducted. Grieving process, stages, and coping strategies are well-articulated. 4.8 points Demonstrates integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of academic material to real-world situations. Presentation of material includes expanded concepts and unique perspective of material studied. Paper has components that represent integrative understanding of the grieving processes, but also includes correlations and analysis between Job and Kübler-Ross’ model.Coverage of subject matter. 0 points Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. 2.34 points Weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. 2.7 points All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. 3.06 points Comprehensive coverage of subject matter is evident. 3.6 points Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter.Thesis Development and Purpose 0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. 0.55 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. 0.63 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. 0.71 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. 0.84 points Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction 0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the thesis and/or main claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. 0.62 points Sufficient justification of thesis and/or main claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 0.72 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of thesis and/or main claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 0.82 points Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of thesis and/or main claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 0.96 points Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive thesis and/or main claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
0.39 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 0.45 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 0.51 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 0.6 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 0 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. 0.39 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. 0.45 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 0.51 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 0.6 points All format elements are correct. Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 0 points No reference page is included. No citations are used. 0.39 points Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. 0.45 points Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present
0.51 points Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. 0.6 pointsIn-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.