1) The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people of a variety of faiths. This calls for acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.
2) Research three diverse faiths. Choose faiths that are less well-known than mainstream faiths or are less known to you, such as Sikh, Bahai, Buddhism, Shintoism, Native American, etc. Compare the philosophy of providing care from the perspective of each of these three faiths with that of the Christian perspective and your own personal perspective.
3) In a minimum of 1250 words, summarize your findings and compare and contrast the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research.
a) Some of the questions to consider when researching the chosen religions are:
i) What is the spiritual perspective on healing?
ii) What are the critical components of healing, such as prayer, meditation, belief, etc?
iii) What is important to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own?
iv) How do patients view health care providers who are able to let go of their own beliefs in the interest of the beliefs and practices of the patient? Compare these beliefs to the Christian philosophy of faith and healing.
4) In your conclusion, describe what you have learned from your research and how this learning can be applied to a health care provider practice.
5) This assignment uses a grading rubric that can be viewed at the assignment's drop box. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
6) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required. Remember that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly source.
7) Submit your essay to Turnitin.com prior to submission to the ANGEL drop box. Upon receipt of the Turnitin report, revise your original work, if necessary.
8) Submit the final assignment draft and the Turnitin Originality Report to the instructor by the end of Module 2.
More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Get a Plagiarism Free Paper Written…
CriteriaAchievement Level Unsatisfactory(0%) Less than Satisfactory
(65%) Satisfactory
(75%) Good
(85%) Excellent
(100%) Comprehension of concepts of diversity of faith 0 points
Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. 3.9 points
Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Presentation of material does not meet minimal requirements of the assignment. Demonstrates no critical thinking aspects.
4.5 points
Exhibits comprehension of the material and attempts to integrate it with outside material. Information represents basic thought and formulation surrounding understanding of varying components of faith across diverse religions and how health care providers handle those diversities.
5.1 points
Demonstrates integrative comprehension. Student exhibits thorough and thoughtful processing of material. Evidentiary support is creatively interwoven and presented in a manner that demonstrates the diversities of faith, the role they play in patient beliefs and practices, and their importance in managing patients’ spiritual care.6 points
Demonstrates integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of concepts surrounding spiritual diversity and circumstances involving application in real-world situations. Presentation of material and components includes expanded and unique perspective relative to similarities and differences of practices across various religions.
Coverage of subject matter.0 points
Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.2.93 points
There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation.3.38 points
All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality.3.83 points
Comprehensive coverage of subject matter is evident.4.5 points
Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter.
Thesis Development and Purpose0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.0.68 points
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. 0.79 points
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.0.89 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.1.05 points
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.